Headline »

| Comments Off on Brain differences in how obsessive-compulsive patients process uncertainty compared to controls

Stern, E., Welsh, R., Gonzalez, R., Fitzgerald, K., Abelson, J., & Taylor, S. (2013). Subjective uncertainty and limbic hyperactivation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Human Brain Mapping. 34, 1956-1970. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22038 …

Read the full story »
Decision Making
Design Science
Brain Imaging
Home » Brain Imaging, Featured, Statistics/Methods

Functional localizers in fMRI

Submitted by No Comment
Functional localizers in fMRI

In this paper, in addition to some interesting results about the use of functional localizers one of our figures was used as the cover art for the journal issue:

Berman, M., Park, J., Gonzalez, R., Polk, T., Gehrke, A., Knaffia, S., Jonides, J. (2010). Evaluating functional localizers: The case of the FFA. Neuroimage, 50, 56-71.  doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.024 (PDF)


Functional localizers are routinely used in neuroimaging studies to test hypotheses about the function of specific brain areas. The specific tasks and stimuli used to localize particular regions vary widely from study to study even when the same cortical region is targeted. Thus, it is important to ask whether task and stimulus changes lead to differences in localization or whether localization procedures are largely immune to differences in tasks and contrasting stimuli. We present two experiments and a literature review that explore whether face localizer tasks yield differential localization in the fusiform gyrus as a function of task and contrasting stimuli. We tested standard localization tasks–passive viewing, 1-back, and 2-back memory tests–and did not find differences in localization based on task. We did, however, find differences in the extent, strength and patterns/reliabilities of the activation in the fusiform gyrus based on comparison stimuli (faces vs. houses compared to faces vs. scrambled stimuli).